Rationalization
Optimizes the Marketing Mix
With controls in place, the Marketing team can work toward optimizing its
mix of programs to produce the best results.
The top performers may be worthy of additional resources. Your
short-term metrics will quickly tell if those additional investments are
justified.
Oftentimes the more difficult task is to eliminate or rationalize programs
that are not producing sufficient return on your investments.
We have seen companies become wedded to programs or themes that have
outlived their usefulness. Only by honestly reviewing impartial metrics can
Marketing managers guide the decisions that must be made.
Once again, Six Sigma processes provide the necessary tools. Comparing Z
scores will quickly identify those that are lagging.
At this point, the first step should be an honest evaluation of whether
simply changing tactics could bring them into compliance.
For example, if a program hits the right general demographic but generates
low returns mainly because it reaches too few potential consumers, could simply
switching to different media channels change the outcome?
Decisions will be based upon many factors in addition to ROI and Z
scores. Other common discriminators
include overall cost, long-term commitments, management affinity, segment
coverage requirements, goal coverage, and the use of financial tools such as
net present value, internal rate of return, and payback period.
I recommend starting with these five important questions:
- What
business goal(s) does the program seek to affect?
- What
business goal(s) could the program affect (if optimized)?
- How do
you know the goal is being affected – how do you know you are being
successful?
- How do
you measure the long term performance of achieving the goal?
- How do
you measure the short term (in-process) achievement of the goal?
Rationalization of this type will reduce waste and increase the return
on investment. This result alone often
pays for the investment in the Six Sigma management process.
No comments:
Post a Comment